The article highlights the dilemma faced by the United States and the Trump administration in addressing the issue of tens of millions of illegal immigrants, many of whom have not committed crimes or violent acts. The author points out that no one knows the exact number of such individuals or the subcategories they fall into. Many entered legally on visas and overstayed, while others crossed borders illegally and have remained in the country for decades. The piece mentions a recent judicial decision that affirmed the authority to deport criminal migrants under the Alien and Sedition Act, emphasizing the challenges of enforcing immigration laws and managing the influx of undocumented immigrants.
The article discusses the consequences of the Biden administration’s approach to open borders, which led to a significant influx of migrants and increased pressure on state and local governments to provide services. The author criticizes the Democratic Party for failing to manage the situation effectively and for allowing the border to remain open, despite repeated claims about its consequences. The author suggests that a balanced approach, such as ‘regularization,’ could be a viable solution to address the issue. This approach would grant conditional legal status to law-abiding immigrants while still enforcing deportation for those who commit crimes.
The author references a historical model of conscription during wartime to propose a structured system for evaluating and granting conditional residency to non-criminal immigrants. However, the author acknowledges potential challenges, including the need to balance the interests of law enforcement and the economy. The piece also discusses the political and economic benefits of such a policy, suggesting it could create a middle ground for American voters and solidify President Trump’s legacy. The author further critiques the Democratic Party’s handling of immigration, emphasizing the need for a more secure and controlled approach to border management.