The resolution, titled ‘Condemning the Incitement of Violence Against President Donald J. Trump by Former FBI Director James Comey,’ was introduced by Pfluger and Lee, both members of the Trump-aligned House GOP. The lawmakers argue that Comey’s post, which they claim could have jeopardized Trump’s security, represents a dangerous precedent that threatens national safety. The post, which was initially interpreted as a harmless image of seashells forming the numbers ’86 47,’ was associated by some with calls for the president’s assassination. Following the post, Comey deleted it and issued an apology, stating he misunderstood its implications and opposes all forms of violence. The resolution demands full transparency from the Department of Justice and seeks to prevent Comey from serving in any public capacity again. Pfluger and Lee argue that the post, made while Trump was on a diplomatic visit to the Middle East, could have compromised the president’s safety and provided cover for adversaries. They also highlight the recent attempts on Trump’s life, including the shooting at the Butler, Pennsylvania, rally, to underscore the gravity of the issue. Lee, who was part of the House task force investigating the Butler incident, emphasizes the legal and ethical concerns surrounding Comey’s actions. Pfluger states that Comey’s past role in the Russia collusion hoax has made his recent actions particularly alarming. The resolution is part of a broader effort by House Republicans to hold individuals accountable for any actions that could threaten the president’s security or incite violence. The lawmakers argue that the post, while seemingly innocuous, carries serious implications for national security and public trust in law enforcement. Comey’s representatives have not responded to calls for comment, leaving the resolution’s impact on his legal and professional standing uncertain. The resolution also calls for the Department of Justice to make its findings public, ensuring transparency in the investigation. This incident highlights the heightened sensitivity surrounding any potential threats to the president’s security in the current political climate.