Alex Berenson, a former New York Times reporter and author, has criticized the Biden administration for not addressing the president’s severe cognitive decline. In a recent column, Berenson discussed leaked excerpts from a 2023 interview between President Joe Biden and Robert Hur, a federal prosecutor who investigated Biden for possessing classified documents. The interview, which was released in early 2024, showed Biden struggling with basic facts, such as the date of the 2016 election, and exhibited signs of significant cognitive impairment. Berenson argues that this information should have been a major focus of the 2024 election campaign, as it highlights the risks of having an unfit leader in the White House.
Alex Berenson Criticizes Biden’s Leadership and Calls for Accountability
Alex Berenson, a former New York Times reporter and author, has criticized the Biden administration for its failure to address the president’s severe cognitive decline. In a recent column, Berenson discussed leaked excerpts from a 2023 interview between President Joe Biden and Robert Hur, a federal prosecutor who investigated Biden for possessing classified documents. The interview, which was released in early 2024, showed Biden struggling with basic facts, such as the date of the 2016 election, and exhibited signs of significant cognitive impairment.
Berenson argues that the leaked interview should have been a major focus of the 2024 election campaign, as it highlights the risks of having an unfit leader in the White House. The interview revealed that Biden was unable to recall even basic information and faced significant challenges in maintaining coherent conversations. These findings, according to Berenson, should have been the central issue in the campaign rather than the other political controversies that dominated the discourse.
Berenson points out that the interview was conducted in 2023, and if Biden had secured re-election, the situation could have worsened significantly. The president’s declining cognitive abilities, combined with his refusal to step down despite clear evidence of his deteriorating condition, could have led to a constitutional crisis if he had faced another term.
Berenson also criticizes the legacy media for downplaying the importance of the Hur report. Despite the gravity of the situation, the media focused on the political aspects rather than the health and fitness of the leader. The author argues that this media neglect contributed to the ongoing failure to address the real risks associated with Biden’s leadership.
In addition to the media’s role, Berenson highlights the personal motivations of the president’s family. He suggests that First Lady Jill Biden and son Hunter Biden had their own reasons for insisting that Biden was fit for office. The author implies that these personal interests, rather than a genuine concern for the country, influenced the administration’s decisions regarding the president’s continued tenure in office.
Berenson concludes that Robert Hur’s report is an important truth-teller who exposed the administration’s cover-up of Biden’s health issues. The author calls Hur a hero for speaking out against the power of the presidency, as he provided crucial information that could have saved the nation from a potential constitutional crisis.