A federal judge has issued a temporary restraining order, halting the Trump administration’s effort to eliminate New York City’s congestion pricing program. The decision, issued by U.S. District Court Judge Lewis Liman, ensures the tolls remain in place until at least June 10 and prevents the administration from withholding federal funding if the city fails to abandon the program. This legal move by Liman comes as the administration faces mounting pressure over its attempt to repeal the initiative.
The congestion pricing program, which charges drivers a $9 toll during peak periods to enter Manhattan south of 60th Street, was launched in January to reduce congestion and fund mass transit improvements. City officials reported a significant drop in traffic, with 5.8 million fewer cars than expected in the congestion zone between January and March, a reduction of about 8% to 13%. This has led to improved road conditions and reduced noise levels, according to officials.
New York City Comptroller Brad Lander pointed out that the program has had a positive impact on the city’s economy and public infrastructure. He emphasized the benefits for businesses, tourism, and public transportation, noting a decline in car crashes, noise complaints, and traffic-related issues. Additionally, the initiative has generated additional revenue that could be used to enhance mass transit systems.
Despite these benefits, the Trump administration has consistently opposed the program, citing concerns over the financial burden on drivers. In February, former President Donald Trump tweeted an image of himself wearing a crown and declared, “CONGESTION PRICING IS DEAD. Manhattan, and all of New York, is SAVED. LONG LIVE THE KING!” This statement further intensified the political debate around the issue.
The Department of Transportation stated that they were considering enforcement actions for noncompliance but agreed to comply with the judge’s temporary restraining order. The city has expressed its hope that the judge will continue to support its efforts to protect working-class Americans from unfair toll charges.
This case highlights the broader political and economic tensions surrounding urban transportation policies in New York City. As the legal battle continues, the outcome will have significant implications for the city’s approach to managing traffic and funding public transit. The program remains a key issue in discussions about urban development strategies and fiscal responsibility.