As South Korea prepares for a pivotal presidential election, voters are deeply divided over how the nation should navigate its complex relationships with China, North Korea, and the United States. The race has become a defining moment for both domestic and foreign policy, with the outcome having significant implications for regional stability and security. Lee Jae-myung, the leader of the progressive Democratic Party, is the leading candidate in the race, but his proposed ‘pragmatic’ approach to geopolitics has generated significant debate. This strategy includes easing previously hardline positions on China and reducing dependence on the U.S. alliance, which has drawn criticism from opponents and critics who argue it could weaken South Korea’s strategic ties with Washington.
Meanwhile, concerns over North Korea’s military threats and China’s growing regional influence have placed the election in a broader geopolitical context, with former U.S. Congresswoman Michelle Steel warning that China’s bullying behavior represents a major security risk. In contrast, former President Yoon Suk Yeol, who was impeached in December 2024, had maintained a firm stance against Chinese aggression, reflecting the deep divisions in South Korea’s political landscape. The candidates’ positions on foreign relations have become central to the campaign, as the nation grapples with the challenges of maintaining a delicate balance between competing global powers.
Lee’s approach has sparked fierce debate, as critics argue that his proposed shift away from a strong U.S. alliance could jeopardize Seoul’s security and economic interests. Former California GOP Congresswoman Michelle Steel emphasized that China’s expansionist behavior poses a significant threat to the region, warning that the country’s growing assertiveness could lead to further destabilization.