Florida’s Board of Governors has rejected Dr. Santa Ono’s confirmation as University of Florida president, citing concerns over his past support for DEI initiatives and handling of antisemitism issues. The Board, which oversees the state’s 12 public universities, voted 10 to 6 against the confirmation of the immunologist, who was the only finalist considered by the UF Board of Trustees.
Ono had pledged to end diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs at the University of Florida, stating in his opening statement that he was there to ‘ensure DEI never returns’ to the institution. He emphasized that science should lead policy, not ideology, and that public universities exist to educate, not indoctrinate. Despite these assertions, the Board scrutinized his past leadership, particularly his tenure at the University of Michigan, where critics raised concerns about his handling of antisemitism and campus protests.
Chris Rufo, a conservative reformer from the Manhattan Institute and a trustee at the New College of Florida, was one of Ono’s major critics. Other critics included Rep. Greg Steube, R-Fla., who praised the Board’s decision, calling for a ‘suitable replacement’ who represents ‘Florida values.’ Sen. Rick Scott, R-Fla., also criticized Ono, citing a ‘concerning record’ from his time at the University of Michigan, where he allowed an illegal, pro-terrorist encampment to take over the campus for nearly a month, putting Jewish students in danger and failing to uphold basic leadership standards.
The Board’s decision came amid Governor Ron DeSantis’ push to reshape Florida’s education system, focusing on combating what he terms ‘woke ideology.’ This move aligns with broader conservative efforts to influence higher education, particularly in the wake of contentious debates over DEI initiatives. The rejection of Ono’s bid signifies a pivotal moment in the state’s educational landscape, with the Board’s stance highlighting the growing influence of conservative values in shaping academic policies.
The case underscores the broader ideological tensions within higher education, where DEI programs have become a focal point of political and cultural debates. The Board’s decision reflects a shift in how public universities are perceived and managed, emphasizing a need for alignment with state-specific values and priorities. This development underscores the complex interplay between academic freedom, political influence, and institutional responsibility in shaping the future of higher education in the U.S.