Researchers have raised concerns that generative AI models are fundamentally limited in their ability to replicate the sensory richness of human creativity. While AI can produce visually striking artwork, experts argue that it struggles to accurately represent experiences tied to human senses such as smell and touch. These limitations, they say, result in creative output that is ‘hollow and shallow,’ lacking the emotional depth and authenticity found in human-generated art.
The debate comes as AI-generated art continues to gain popularity in various fields, from digital design to entertainment. However, some artists and researchers warn that the technology’s current capabilities may not be able to fully capture the complexity of human sensory experiences. While AI can mimic visual elements, it falls short in conveying the nuanced interplay of taste, texture, and other sensory details that contribute to the artistic experience. This has led to calls for greater caution in the adoption of AI as a creative tool, with some experts suggesting that it should complement rather than replace human creativity.