President Donald Trump has suggested that Israel’s strike on Iran’s nuclear facilities may enhance the prospects for a U.S.-Iran nuclear deal, despite Iran’s announced suspension of talks. While the administration seeks a diplomatic resolution, Iran has stated it will not participate further in negotiations amid the heightened tensions.
During an interview with Axios, Trump addressed whether the Israeli strike could jeopardize U.S. efforts to reach a deal with Iran. When asked about the implications of Israel’s bombing, the president reportedly responded, ‘I don’t think so. Maybe the opposite. Maybe now they will negotiate seriously.’ This indicates Trump’s belief that the strike might act as a catalyst for more serious diplomatic efforts, even though the situation remains complex and politically sensitive.
The administration has been urging Iran to reach a deal ‘before there is nothing left,’ especially after Israel’s attacks on Iran’s nuclear and ballistic missile sites. Trump, who withdrew the U.S. from the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) during his first term, has signaled that a deal with Iran is among his top priorities. However, he has consistently maintained that the country will not be allowed to develop nuclear weapons, highlighting the challenges in achieving a balanced agreement.
Iran has rejected the U.S. position, asserting that the country has not respected its right to enrich uranium for non-violent purposes. Reports suggest that Trump has signaled openness to allowing Iran to continue some level of uranium enrichment for civilian use, although the details remain unclear. These developments have complicated the nuclear negotiations, as both sides continue to negotiate over various terms and conditions.
The suspended talks, which were scheduled to resume on Sunday, have been put on hold by Iran, which has stated it will not participate until further notice. The situation now presents a significant challenge for the U.S. administration, which must navigate the delicate balance between diplomatic engagement and the potential for further conflict. As tensions continue to escalate, the outcome of these discussions will have far-reaching implications for regional stability and international relations.