Security experts and former government officials are advocating for the use of private security contractors (PSCs) as a potential solution to the ongoing crisis in Gaza. The plan, which has been developed by a group including the Jewish Institute for National Security of America (JINSA) and the Vandenberg Coalition, suggests that PSCs could play a vital role in managing aid distribution and training local Palestinian security forces. This approach is seen as a way to break Hamas’ hold on the region and establish a more stable environment for the people of Gaza.
The proposal gained attention after the Trump administration’s re-entry into the scene in late 2024, leading to the establishment of the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) as a means to distribute aid and protect relief efforts. The GHF, which has already delivered over 16 million meals since its inception, is working closely with various international aid organizations to ensure that aid reaches those in need. However, the initial distribution of aid faced several challenges, including reports of violence and chaos at some of the aid sites. Despite these difficulties, the foundation continues to operate and aims to improve its effectiveness in the coming months.
John Hannah, a former national security advisor to Dick Cheney and current senior fellow at JINSA, believes that the use of PSCs could provide a much-needed solution to the crisis in Gaza. He argues that PSCs, with their experience in the Middle East and a proven track record of effectiveness, are well-suited to take on the role of managing aid distribution and providing security in the region. Hannah also emphasizes the importance of engaging Arab and international aid organizations to ensure that the aid effort is both effective and sustainable. He believes that this approach could not only provide immediate relief to the people of Gaza but also lay the foundation for long-term stability and rebuilding.
However, the plan has faced some political challenges, particularly regarding the role of private security contractors. Some have raised concerns about the potential for these contractors to be used for ulterior motives or to serve the interests of the private sector rather than the people of Gaza. Despite these concerns, Hannah and his colleagues believe that the plan has the potential to be a viable solution to the crisis in Gaza and that it should be given serious consideration by the Trump administration and other international partners.
The plan also includes the establishment of a new Palestinian security force that could be trained by PSCs. This force would be composed of local Palestinian security officers who could be trusted by both the local population and the Israeli government. The goal of this force would be to provide security and stability to the region while also working to break Hamas’ hold on the area. The establishment of such a force would require significant investment and coordination, but Hannah believes that it is a necessary step towards long-term stability in Gaza.
Overall, the proposal for the use of private security contractors in Gaza represents a unique approach to the ongoing crisis. While it has faced some challenges, particularly regarding the role of private security contractors, the plan has the potential to provide immediate relief to the people of Gaza and lay the foundation for long-term stability. The success of this plan will depend on the cooperation of all parties involved, including the United States, Israel, and Arab nations, as well as the effective implementation of the proposed strategies.