Retired Lt. Colonel Daniel Davis and Will Thibeau, director of the Claremont Institute, discussed the risks of escalating U.S. military involvement in the Middle East during a segment on ‘Jesse Watters Primetime.’ Davis, a former military official with extensive experience in counterterrorism and regional stability, warned that the continued deployment of U.S. forces in the region could fuel further conflict rather than bring lasting peace.
Thibeau, a prominent conservative commentator and academic, echoed Davis’ concerns, arguing that the long-term costs of military intervention—both in terms of financial expenditure and loss of life—far exceed any potential benefits. He emphasized that the United States should prioritize domestic defense and economic stability over overseas engagements that often lack clear strategic outcomes. Both speakers called for a reevaluation of current foreign policy strategies, advocating for a more restrained approach that focuses on diplomacy and strategic alliances rather than prolonged military presence.
This debate comes at a time when the U.S. is increasingly questioned about its role in global conflicts. Analysts note that while some argue for maintaining strong military commitments to prevent regional instability, others believe that such interventions have contributed to the very conflicts they aim to resolve.