Free Press, a prominent advocacy group, has accused FCC Chair Brendan Carr of engaging in ‘political theater’ by implementing a controversial net neutrality rollback without public comment. The decision follows a court ruling that classified broadband as an ‘information service’, removing the FCC’s authority to regulate internet service providers (ISPs) and their practices. Carr’s ‘Delete, Delete, Delete’ initiative, aimed at eliminating outdated regulations, has drawn criticism for allegedly serving the interests of broadband monopolies and their lobbyists rather than the public. Critics argue that the move lacks transparency and undermines efforts to protect net neutrality, which has been a contentious issue for years.
Free Press vice president Matt Wood criticized the FCC’s actions, stating that the so-called deletion of rules is little more than a premature housekeeping step. Wood emphasized that the appeals process for the case involving the 6th Circuit’s ruling is not yet complete, noting that Free Press and its allies have sought additional time to consider their options at the Supreme Court. He argued that the FCC’s decision to remove the rules without public input is politically motivated and fails to address the broader implications for internet governance.
The controversy highlights the ongoing battle between regulatory bodies and advocacy groups over the future of the internet. While the FCC claims its actions are necessary to streamline regulations, critics like Free Press argue that the move risks eroding essential safeguards for internet users. The debate over net neutrality continues to be a significant point of contention, with implications for both consumers and the digital economy. As the legal and political landscape evolves, the outcome of this case may shape the future of internet regulation in the United States.