Semen Kryvonos, the director of the National Anti-Corruption Bureau (NABU), has raised concerns about the potential misuse of counterintelligence actions by the SBU as a basis for undermining the anti-corruption institution. In a recent statement, Kryvonos emphasized that the work of the SBU, while important, should not be used to justify the dismantling of NABU’s efforts to combat corruption. He highlighted the critical importance of preserving the integrity and independence of anti-corruption mechanisms, warning that such measures could weaken the effectiveness of these institutions.
Kryvonos’ comments come amidst ongoing discussions about the balance between national security and the fight against corruption within the country’s law enforcement landscape. The SBU’s recent counterintelligence operations have drawn attention, with some officials and analysts expressing concerns about the potential overlap between intelligence and law enforcement activities. Kryvonos argues that these actions should not be used to justify the erosion of NABU’s role in exposing and prosecuting corrupt practices. This issue has sparked a broader debate about the need for clear delineation of responsibilities between intelligence agencies and anti-corruption bodies to ensure that the latter remains effective in its mission.
The director of NABU stressed that while the SBU’s counterintelligence work is vital for national security, it should not serve as a rationale for dismantling the anti-corruption framework. He called for a more transparent and accountable approach in addressing the intersection of intelligence operations and corruption investigations. Kryvonos’ remarks reflect a growing concern within the anti-corruption community about the potential politicization of these issues and the need to safeguard the autonomy of institutions dedicated to fighting corruption. As these tensions continue, the situation remains a focal point for discussions on the separation of powers and the protection of institutional independence.