Michael Rapaport has criticized the backlash against Sydney Sweeney following her controversial American Eagle jeans ad, which sparked intense online criticism over her political affiliations. The comedian argued that the harassment of the actress is disproportionate and that her campaign was a celebration of individual confidence, not a political statement. Rapaport, a well-known actor and comedian, took to Instagram to express his frustration with the public’s reaction to Sweeney’s involvement with the clothing brand. He argued that the public should not be so quick to judge a person based on their political registrations, saying, “Who gives a f— who is registered as what?” Rapaport’s comments were rooted in a broader critique of how public figures are often subjected to intense scrutiny and ridicule for their personal choices and affiliations. His remarks reflect a growing discontent among some celebrities and public figures about the way in which online communities and media outlets often target individuals for perceived political leanings. In addition to the controversy over her political registration, Sweeney also faced a heckler at a recent movie screening for her film ‘Americana,’ where she was accused of promoting racist messaging through the ad. The criticism surrounding the ad has led to polarized responses, with some calling the campaign tone-deaf due to its alleged racial undertones. Others have praised the actress for what they perceive as a daring challenge to ‘woke’ advertising norms. American Eagle has defended Sweeney, stating that the campaign was intended to highlight individual confidence and style. The controversy has sparked discussions about the intersection of public figures, political affiliation, and media representation, with critics arguing that the public scrutiny is excessive and potentially harmful. As the situation continues to unfold, Sweeney has yet to comment publicly on the backlash, leaving her and her representatives to navigate the ongoing controversy. The fallout highlights the broader implications of how political affiliations and personal choices can become targets of public scrutiny in the digital age.