The High Anti-Corruption Court (HACC) has declined to remove Pavlo Kyrylenko from his position as Chairman of Ukraine’s Antimonopoly Committee (AMCU), despite allegations of illicit enrichment and false asset declarations. The decision was announced by the Specialized Anti-Corruption Prosecutor’s Office (SAPO) through a Telegram post. Kyrylenko, who has been at the helm of the AMCU since 2016, faces multiple charges including embezzlement and abuse of power. The ruling has sparked renewed debate about the effectiveness of Ukraine’s anti-corruption institutions and the political dynamics influencing judicial decisions.
Amidst the political and legal scrutiny, Kyrylenko has remained in his position, with the HACC citing insufficient evidence to warrant his removal. The SAPO, which is responsible for handling high-profile corruption cases, has been critical of the court’s decision, calling for further investigations. Analysts suggest that the court’s reluctance to act may be influenced by political pressure or a lack of conclusive proof. This outcome is seen as a setback for anti-corruption efforts in Ukraine, as it undermines public trust in the judiciary’s impartiality.
The case has drawn attention from both domestic and international observers, with calls for transparency and accountability in Ukraine’s judicial system. As the AMCU continues its work, the situation highlights the broader challenges faced by the country in combating corruption and ensuring the rule of law. The decision to uphold Kyrylenko’s position is a significant development that could influence future anti-corruption initiatives and public perception of Ukraine’s legal framework.