White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller recently criticized Boston’s mayor on Hannity, accusing him of prioritizing cultural events over immigration policy. The mayor was specifically called out for hosting a mariachi band while refusing to comply with federal pressure to curb sanctuary city practices. Miller’s remarks underscore the ongoing political friction around sanctuary cities, with critics arguing that such policies undermine immigration enforcement. The incident comes amid heightened discussions about immigration reform and the role of local governments in federal immigration matters. While the mayor’s decision to host the mariachi band was seen as a celebration of cultural diversity, Miller framed it as an example of local officials resisting federal directives. This tension highlights the broader debate over sanctuary city policies, which critics argue contribute to the erosion of immigration controls and the safety of communities. The controversy reflects the ideological divide between federal and local authorities on immigration, with conservative figures like Miller advocating for stricter enforcement and local leaders defending their right to offer refuge to undocumented immigrants. As these tensions continue, the issue of sanctuary cities remains a significant point of contention in national political discourse.