India’s Supreme Court has temporarily halted the removal of stray dogs from New Delhi, reversing its earlier directive that had sparked widespread public outcry. The court’s decision comes after intense criticism of the policy, which was initially aimed at addressing a surge in dog bite incidents across the city. The order, issued in response to reports of increasing attacks, had led to the removal of thousands of stray dogs, drawing both support and opposition from different quarters.
Animal welfare organizations and citizens have been vocal in their opposition to the policy, arguing that culling is an inhumane solution to a complex issue. Proponents of the initial order, however, maintain that the measure was necessary to protect public safety and reduce the incidence of dog attacks. The Supreme Court’s reversal highlights the ongoing debate over animal rights and the balance between public safety and ethical considerations in urban governance.
With the removal of stray dogs now on hold, authorities are expected to revisit the issue and consider alternative measures to manage the stray dog population. These could include sterilization programs, stricter enforcement of pet ownership laws, and increased public awareness campaigns. The court’s decision underscores the sensitivity of the issue and the need for a more humane and sustainable approach to urban animal management in New Delhi.