Professional tennis players have voiced strong opposition to the United States Open’s decision to start on Sunday instead of Monday. The switch to an earlier start time has prompted significant criticism from athletes, who claim it adversely affects their ability to perform at their best and recover properly. Many players have called for a return to the traditional Monday start date, emphasizing the importance of adequate rest and preparation for the tournament’s demanding schedule.
The US Open, one of the four Grand Slam tournaments, has long been held on Monday, with the first match traditionally starting at 12:30 PM. This scheduling choice was believed to provide players with a more favorable playing condition, allowing for a better balance between rest, preparation, and the physical demands of competing at the highest level.
Past players, including legends like Pete Sampras and Roger Federer, have expressed their preference for the Monday start, citing the need for a full week of preparation and recovery. Current players, such as Novak Djokovic and Rafael Nadal, have also joined the chorus of criticism, arguing that the Sunday start disrupts their training routines and mental focus.
The tournament organizers, the United States Tennis Association (USTA), have defended their decision, emphasizing the need to accommodate larger crowds and provide better television viewership. However, many players argue that the scheduling change comes at the expense of player well-being and competitive fairness. The controversy has sparked a broader debate within the tennis community about the balance between commercial interests and the health and performance of athletes.
As the 2023 US Open approaches, the dispute over the start date continues to dominate discussions among players, coaches, and fans. The outcome of this debate could have lasting implications for future tournament schedules and the broader landscape of professional tennis competitions.