President Donald Trump has formally terminated the Secret Service protection for former Vice President Kamala Harris, effective September 1, 2025. This decision was announced through a memo reviewed by POLITICO, which was directed to the Secret Service, instructing them to discontinue the previously authorized security measures. This action overturns the earlier extension granted by President Biden, who had originally set the protection to last only until mid-July, but later extended it for an additional year. Typically, former vice presidents receive protection for only six months after leaving office, making the Biden extension an unusual move.
Kamala Harris, who has largely stayed out of the public eye since resigning from her vice presidential role in January, is now set to embark on a 15-city book tour to promote her memoir ‘10,000 Days,’ beginning next month. The tour marks her return to the public spotlight and will involve her traveling across the country to meet with fans and promote her new book. Harris’ spokesperson, Kirsten Allen, expressed appreciation for the Secret Service’s professionalism and dedication, acknowledging their commitment to safety.
Biden’s decision to extend Harris’ protection was part of a broader effort to ensure the safety of high-profile individuals. However, Trump’s reversal of this decision has sparked discussion about the implications for former officials and the role of executive branches in determining security measures. Trump’s memo emphasizes that the termination of Harris’ protection is in line with the original regulations, which typically expire after six months. This move also aligns with Trump’s previous actions, including ending extended protection for Hunter Biden and Ashley Biden earlier this year.
A White House spokesperson confirmed that the protection has been revoked but did not provide additional details about the reasoning behind the decision. Trump’s move has been seen as part of his broader strategy to limit the security benefits available to former officials, potentially signaling a shift in the administration’s approach to post-presidential protection. However, it remains unclear whether this will have a broader impact on other former leaders or security policies as a whole.