Supporters of Charlie Kirk continue to assert that his assassination has been used as a tool to sow division and spread misinformation about his relationship with Israel, a nation he staunchly defended throughout his career. In the wake of the tragedy, social media platforms were flooded with accusations that the conservative activist had some form of support or connection with Hamas, a claim that has been categorically denied by his allies and supporters.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu swiftly condemned the false narratives, expressing his personal grief at Kirk’s loss while honoring his legacy as a defender of Israel. ‘Charlie Kirk was a champion of speaking truth and defending freedom,’ Netanyahu noted, ‘a lion-hearted friend of Israel who fought the lies and stood tall for Judeo-Christian civilization.’
The controversy has drawn in prominent religious figures such as Rabbi Pesach Wolicki, who had spoken with Kirk the night before his assassination. Wolicki emphasized that Kirk’s strong support for Israel remained unshaken, even as he engaged with questions on the topic. ‘He was heading out on a campus tour the next day and knew he’d face many questions about Israel. He wanted to hear what I had to say on issues he expected to be asked about. Why would he do that if he had abandoned Israel? The very fact the meeting happened proves he had not.’
Kirk’s advocacy for Israel was rooted in his evangelical Christian beliefs, which he often tied to the scriptural land rights given to the Jewish people. He made it clear in interviews and public statements that he felt a deep spiritual connection to the Holy Land and believed in the fulfillment of prophecy related to Israel’s sovereignty. ‘I believe in the scriptural land rights given to Israel,’ Kirk stated on his podcast with Megyn Kelly, ‘I believe in the fulfillment of prophecy. I am not a theologian, but I’m a Christian. My life was changed in Israel — the spiritual energy there is so amazing. I want them to win, and I’ve said that repeatedly.’
His stance was further reinforced in a viral video from a May debate at Cambridge, where he took a firm position against Hamas and defended Israel’s right to defend itself. ‘When you declare war on Israel, expect a firestorm in reaction,’ he said. ‘On Shabbat, Hamas invaded Israel, deciding to go recklessly to music concerts, to homes, to kibbutzes and taking 200-plus hostages. They knew what they were doing… A tragic truth of war is that civilians die. I don’t like it, and you don’t like it. And they brought it upon themselves. The only operation and entity to blame is the leadership of Hamas, not the Israeli government, for fighting this defensive war. … There is a good guy and there is a bad guy.’
In the wake of the assassination, some critics of Israel, as well as certain liberal groups, have been accused of perpetuating the conspiracy theories surrounding Kirk’s life and death. This has led to calls for accountability, with figures such as Mike Huckabee condemning the efforts to exploit the tragedy for personal gain. ‘It’s painful to see people back in the US attempt to get clicks & make $$ by making up outrageous lies while exploiting the death of Charlie Kirk whose impact & character the propagandists will never have. @IsraeliPM sets the record straight.’
Moreover, the incident has prompted discussions about the impact of misinformation in the public sphere. The role of social media in amplifying baseless claims has been a topic of concern, with some advocating for stronger measures to combat the spread of false information. Israel Ganz, head of the Yesha Council, expressed the collective mourning of his community: ‘Our community bow[ed] their heads in mourning over the murder of a friend and lover of Israel.’
The memory of Kirk has also inspired acts of solidarity and prayer. Dozens of Christians and Jews gathered on the Temple Mount in Jerusalem to honor him, offering a symbol of the coexistence and peace he often advocated for. ‘In the spirit of coexistence that Kirk promoted, these acts of unity reflect the enduring legacy of his beliefs and values,’ noted one observer. ‘His love for Israel was incredibly real and sincere,’ said Josh Nass, a former conservative youth commentator who met Kirk in 2012, describing his commitment to Israel as being central to his life’s work.
As the investigation into Kirk’s assassination continues, the broader implications of his legacy remain a subject of reflection. His story has become a focal point for discussions on the intersection between faith, politics, and national identity. The events surrounding his life and death continue to resonate with the communities he impacted, reinforcing the importance of truth, freedom, and the defense of one’s beliefs in the face of adversity.