Republican Senator Ted Cruz has criticized the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) head Brendan Carr for using ‘mafioso’ tactics against ABC, where the network indefinitely suspended Jimmy Kimmel’s late-night show after his remarks on the recent assassination of conservative influencer Charlie Kirk. Carr’s threatening statements against the network have drawn sharp criticism from Cruz, who likened Carr’s approach to the tone of the movie Goodfellas, warning of the potential for government overreach.
Meanwhile, US President Donald Trump has expressed support for Carr’s actions, suggesting that critical networks could face license revocations. Trump has long feuded with major US media outlets such as CNN, NBC, CBS, and others, accusing them of ‘fake news’ and calling for their licenses to be revoked over what he called political bias. This feud has led to legal battles, such as the recent $16 million settlement between Trump and CBS parent company Paramount over the editing of Kamala Harris’ ’60 Minutes’ interview during the 2024 elections.
Cruz’s concerns highlight a growing political divide around the role of the FCC and the regulation of media. While Cruz warns of the risks of government overreach, Trump’s support for Carr’s actions suggests a continued attempt to exert pressure on media outlets perceived as critical of his administration. The situation underscores the tensions within the Trump administration’s approach to media regulation and its potential impact on free speech and journalistic independence.
The FCC’s role in regulating broadcast media has always been a contentious issue, especially in the context of political polarization. Carr’s comments have reignited debates about the balance between free speech and the responsibility of media to uphold ethical standards. As the situation continues to unfold, the broader implications for media freedom and government oversight remain uncertain.