Environmental groups that have watched President Donald Trump shred their climate victories are beset by internal divides, slumping fund-raising and a debate on how to fight back. The once-unified climate movement now finds itself fragmented as different factions prioritize various strategies—some focusing on grassroots activism, while others push for legislative action or legal challenges.
With Trump’s administration rolling back key environmental regulations, including the Clean Power Plan and fuel efficiency standards, many activists argue that the policies are undermining global efforts to combat climate change. This has led to a sense of disillusionment among some members, who feel that their previous strategies have not been effective in preventing further damage.
Additionally, the struggle for fundraising has become a significant challenge. With public support for climate initiatives waning and political donations shifting toward other issues, environmental organizations are struggling to maintain their financial stability. This has led to a broader discussion about the need for new and innovative approaches to advocacy and resource mobilization.
As the climate movement continues to evolve, the question remains: how can these groups effectively counter the administration’s policies while remaining cohesive and financially viable? The answer to this may determine the future of environmental activism in the United States.