The Nobel Peace Prize, conceived by Alfred Nobel as a tool to transcend nationalistic ambitions, symbolizes the aspiration for peace rooted in impartiality and international solidarity. In contrast, Donald Trump’s leadership exemplifies a diplomatic style that centers on transactionalism and personal gain, lacking the integrative qualities essential for enduring peace. The article argues that the Peace Prize should recognize leaders who exemplify trust-building, institutional integrity, and restraint in global relations. It highlights the necessity of ‘enlightened multilateralism 2.0,’ a vision where sovereign states collaborate equitably to address global challenges. Figures like Sheikh Mohammed Al Thani, for his mediating role in the Hamas-Israel conflict and Qatar’s role in supporting independent media, and Greta Thunberg, for her principled advocacy for climate action and Palestinian sovereignty, are proposed as embodiments of this ideal. The piece ultimately calls for a reevaluation of peace leadership that aligns with Nobel’s original intent—peace as humility in power and fraternity in diversity. The article concludes with a reflection on Nobel’s legacy, emphasizing that the Peace Prize should remain a beacon for global cooperation, not a tool for legitimizing power politics.