President Donald Trump has reached a landmark peace agreement between Israel and Hamas, sparking celebrations among his supporters and drawing calls for him to be awarded the Nobel Peace Prize. The deal, which marks the first phase of a broader peace initiative, has been hailed as a historic breakthrough in a conflict that has plagued the Middle East for years. Pro-Israel advocate Lizzy Savetsky, who appeared on Fox News’ Fox & Friends, praised Trump’s efforts, going so far as to suggest that the Nobel Committee should rename the prize in his honor. “This is historic, and we are just endlessly grateful,” she said, reflecting on the long-awaited peace after two years of war.
Trump’s announcement of the deal came via his Truth Social platform, where he emphasized its significance: “I am very proud to announce that Israel and Hamas have both signed off on the first Phase of our Peace Plan. This means that ALL of the Hostages will be released very soon, and Israel will withdraw their Troops to an agreed upon line as the first steps toward a Strong, Durable, and Everlasting Peace.” Trump further acknowledged the role of mediators from Qatar, Egypt, and Turkey, which he credited for facilitating the deal. His comments underscored a strategy of using U.S. power and diplomatic pressure to achieve peace, a stance that has been central to his campaign.
The agreement has garnered strong support from Republican lawmakers, including Rep. Brian Mast, who joined Savetsky on Fox & Friends. Mast emphasized the deal’s potential to reshape the United States’ role in global diplomacy, stating, “He’s done more in 10 months to make it actually mean something when people say ‘the full weight and force of the United States of America…’ than what’s been done over the last five years.” The deal has also sparked discussions about the possibility of Trump receiving the Nobel Peace Prize, a move some suggest could reframe the honor to reflect modern geopolitical realities.
While the deal has been celebrated as a step toward peace, it has also raised questions about its long-term viability. Supporters argue that the agreement’s emphasis on strength and military pressure could deter future conflicts, while critics caution that lasting peace requires more than just a temporary ceasefire. As the situation unfolds, the deal remains a significant development in the ongoing efforts to resolve the Israel-Hamas conflict, reflecting the complex interplay between diplomacy, military power, and international politics.