Political analyst Katie Zacharia has emerged as a vocal critic of Kamala Harris for what she calls a major oversight in the former vice president’s political playbook. During an appearance on ‘Fox News @ Night,’ Zacharia pointed out that Harris failed to leverage the 25th Amendment to address potential issues with President Joe Biden’s capacity to serve. This claim comes amidst a broader conversation about the future political strategies of both Harris and Governor Gavin Newsom, who is also being scrutinized for his own leadership challenges.
Zacharia’s discussion focused on the implications of not pursuing constitutional mechanisms to address executive dysfunction. While the 25, Amendment allows for the removal of a president who is incapacitated, it requires a two-thirds majority in Congress to initiate the process. The analyst emphasized that Harris, as a potential successor, could have used this avenue to ensure continuity in leadership should Biden’s condition deteriorate. However, Zacharia suggested that Harris’ decision to avoid this option may indicate a strategic hesitation or a lack of readiness to take on such a high-stakes political maneuver.
The debate over the 25th Amendment has intensified in recent months, especially as concerns over Biden’s health and cognitive function have become more pronounced. The analyst’s comments have sparked discussions among political observers about the potential for such a constitutional pathway to be utilized in the future. While some argue that the process is unnecessarily complex and politically risky, others believe it could provide a more structured approach to addressing executive vulnerability. As the political landscape continues to evolve, the discussion around the 25th Amendment and its potential application in high-stakes situations remains a critical topic of debate among analysts and policymakers.