Former US Vice President Dick Cheney has passed away at the age of 84, following complications from pneumonia and heart and vascular disease. His family announced his death on Tuesday, noting that he was surrounded by loved ones during his final moments. Cheney, who was a key architect behind the 2003 US invasion of Iraq, served from 2001 to 2009 as Vice President under President George W. Bush. His tenure was marked by a staunch stance on the ‘war on terror’, the approval of military actions, and involvement in controversial policies such as the use of torture and warrantless surveillance on American citizens.
Critics argue that Cheney’s actions, particularly his role in the Iraq War, led to far-reaching consequences including the destabilization of the Middle East, the rise of extremist groups like ISIS, and a significant loss of life. It is estimated that over 4,600 American soldiers and up to 300,000 Iraqi civilians were killed as a result of the conflict. In 2014, Cheney expressed no regret over his decision-making, stating he would do it again in a minute, despite a Senate report condemning the CIA’s interrogation methods as unethical and ineffective.
Cheney’s health challenges were also a significant part of his life. He suffered from cardiovascular disease for several decades, starting with his first heart attack at 37 in 1978. He underwent multiple surgeries, including a heart transplant in 2012, which he survived. Despite his health issues, he remained politically active, shaping US foreign policy until his passing. His death has sparked a wide range of reactions, with some remembering his contributions to national security and others condemning the long-term consequences of his decisions in the Middle East.
As the nation mourns the loss of a former leader, the debate over Cheney’s legacy continues. While some praise his unwavering commitment to national security after the 9/11 attacks, others highlight the significant costs of his policies in terms of human lives and international relations. The impact of his policies on the US and global stability remains a topic of intense discussion among historians, political analysts, and the public.