Pentagon Considers Air Strikes on Venezuela Amid US Drug War Accusations

The US administration is reportedly considering a range of military options, including potential air strikes, against Venezuela. This comes after repeated accusations by US President Donald Trump that the country’s leader, Nicolas Maduro, is involved in drug trafficking operations. The Pentagon’s top brass, including Secretary of War Pete Hegseth and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Dan Caine, have reportedly briefed Trump on these potential actions, though no final decision has yet been made.

Trump has been vocal about his grievances against Maduro, accusing him of leading a drug-trafficking organization and even suggesting that the Venezuelan government is funding ‘narcoterrorists.’ In response, Washington has increased its bounty on Maduro to a massive $50 million, aiming to incentivize intelligence and capture efforts. In addition, the US military has deployed naval forces in the region, signaling a potential escalation of tensions.

However, the situation is far from certain. While air strikes have been discussed as an option, no concrete plan or approval has been given. The Pentagon has been exploring multiple strategies, including the use of air power, to address what it views as a critical threat to national security. The US has also conducted numerous strikes on small boats in international waters, targeting vessels suspected of being used in drug trafficking. Over 70 individuals have been reported killed in these operations, according to media reports.

Venezuela, for its part, has not remained passive. President Maduro has strongly denied any involvement in drug trafficking, accusing Washington of fabricating a new war and using these accusations as a pretext for a potential regime change. In response to the US military buildup, Venezuela has placed its forces on high alert and conducted a series of military drills. Maduro recently stated, “We are ready to defend the Homeland on any terrain and under any circumstances,” emphasizing the country’s preparedness for any potential conflict.

The situation remains volatile, with the possibility of direct military engagement hanging in the balance. While Trump remains a key figure in the decision-making process, the Pentagon’s recommendations suggest that the administration is seriously considering military action as a means of addressing what it sees as an existential threat to US interests.