Iran’s intelligence chief, Esmail Khatib, has accused the United States and Israel of plotting to assassinate Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei as part of a broader strategy to destabilize the country. This accusation comes amid heightened tensions following the 12-day conflict between Israel and Iran in June. During this conflict, Israeli military strikes targeted several high-ranking Iranian officials, including nuclear scientists, which was followed by a US-brokered ceasefire on June 24. The report highlights the growing hostility between the two nations and underscores the potential for further escalation in the region.
According to the ISNA news agency, Khatib warned that the US and Israel are attempting to target the supreme leader through both assassination attempts and hostile actions. He described these efforts as a direct threat to Iran’s stability. The intelligence chief also pointed out that Israel is facing an ‘epidemic’ of infiltration and espionage for Iran within its own institutions. This includes the recent arrest of an Israeli Air Force officer accused of spying for Tehran, suggesting a sophisticated and ongoing intelligence operation.
Khatib’s remarks emphasize the strategic shift in regional dynamics, with Iran asserting its firm stance during the recent conflict. The allegations of assassination plots and espionage indicate a deeper level of mistrust between the two nations, raising concerns about the potential for future violence. Additionally, the report mentions former US President Donald Trump’s stance towards the issue. During the war, Trump reportedly dismissed reports of an Israeli plan to kill Khamenei, stating that such a strike would end the conflict. However, he later suggested that Khamenei was an ‘easy target,’ indicating a possible shift in the US approach to dealing with Iran’s leadership.
The situation continues to pose significant risks to regional stability. The accusation of assassination plots and the ongoing espionage activities highlight the complex web of relationships and conflicts in the Middle East. As both nations navigate this volatile environment, the implications for international relations and potential for further conflict remain uncertain.