The proposed agreement at the recent climate summit has faced sharp criticism for its reluctance to mandate a rapid transition away from fossil fuels. European countries, which have long advocated for stricter emissions reductions, were particularly dismayed. Meanwhile, low-lying Pacific island nations, which are among the most vulnerable to rising sea levels and climate-related disasters, have expressed disappointment over the deal’s lack of binding commitments to renewable energy.
Environmental groups have condemned the deal, arguing that its failure to set concrete targets for phasing out coal, oil, and gas undermines global efforts to keep global warming below 1.5°C. The compromise, which appears to prioritize economic growth over environmental protection, has sparked fears that it may delay critical climate action. Analysts suggest that the agreement could have significant implications for the future of the global energy market and international climate diplomacy.