Johnson Pursues Modified FISA Extension Amid GOP Divisions

House Speaker Mike Johnson is racing against time to secure a modified reauthorization of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA), as Republican lawmakers grapple with internal divisions over the timeline and scope of the extension. The original plan, favored by White House officials and congressional leadership, called for an 18-month reauthorization of Section 702, which empowers U.S. intelligence agencies to conduct warrantless surveillance on foreign persons. However, hardline conservatives, particularly members of the Freedom Caucus, have rejected this approach, demanding a longer extension tied to additional reforms to address concerns over potential abuses of the program.

Leaders are now exploring a compromise that would shorten the reauthorization period to one year while incorporating provisions to impose stricter oversight on FISA’s use. This shift reflects growing pressure from the Freedom Caucus, which has argued that a 18-month extension without reforms risks enabling surveillance overreach. Freedom Caucus Chair Andy Harris (R-Md.) has expressed confidence that his group could secure a three-year extension with “significant reforms” by the end of Thursday, though GOP leaders remain skeptical about the feasibility of such a deal. The potential inclusion of guardrails on warrantless surveillance has also sparked concern, as Senate leaders warn that such amendments could derail the entire package.

The impasse highlights deeper tensions within the Republican Party over balancing national security priorities with civil liberties concerns. While some conservative lawmakers, like Rep. Ralph Norman (R-S.C.), have hinted at openness to a one-year extension, others remain steadfast in their demands for a longer timeline. House Majority Leader Steve Scalise acknowledged the need for a “modified” extension, signaling that leaders are willing to adjust their stance to avoid a government shutdown. With the April 20 deadline approaching, the outcome of these negotiations could shape the future of U.S. surveillance policy and congressional priorities ahead of the November elections.