Federal Judge Orders Release of Georgetown Researcher Detained Over Alleged Hamas Propaganda

A federal judge on Wednesday ordered the release of Badar Khan Suri, a postdoctoral researcher at Georgetown University, after he was detained in March by immigration authorities for allegedly spreading Hamas propaganda. Federal Judge Patricia Tolliver Giles, presiding in a Virginia court, ruled that the U.S. government did not provide sufficient evidence to counter Suri’s claims of being punished for his views on the conflict in Gaza. The court proceeding took place during a hearing where the judge emphasized the lack of credible proof presented by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), which had previously accused Suri of ‘actively spreading Hamas propaganda and promoting antisemitism on social media.’

Suri, an Indian national on a student visa, was detained in Texas following his arrest in March. His legal team argued that his detention was politically motivated and that his academic activities in the U.S. were unrelated to the alleged misconduct. A Georgetown University spokesperson confirmed that Suri was granted his visa for doctoral research on peace building in Iraq and Afghanistan, suggesting that his academic purpose does not align with the accusations against him. The university expressed concern over the circumstances of his detention, which has raised questions about the legal and ethical implications of detaining a graduate researcher under such circumstances.

The DHS had claimed that Suri had close connections to a known or suspected Hamas advisor, though the identity of the individual was never disclosed. Secretary of State Marco Rubio had determined in March that Suri’s activities and presence in the U.S. ‘rendered him deportable’ under the Immigration and Nationality Act, a rarely used legal mechanism that grants the Secretary of State significant discretion in deciding who should be deported. This provision, which allows for the removal of individuals who pose ‘potentially serious adverse foreign policy consequences,’ has been controversial due to its broad interpretation and potential for political bias.

In addition to the Suri case, a separate but related development has emerged in the legal landscape. A Milwaukee judge has been indicted for allegedly helping an immigrant evade U.S. immigration authorities, facing up to six years in prison. This case highlights the increasing scrutiny of immigration enforcement and the legal complexities surrounding the deportation of foreign nationals. As the Suri case continues to unfold, it prompts broader discussions about the balance between national security and individual rights, particularly for those holding foreign national status in the United States.