Columnist Argues Trump’s 2020 Victory Would Have Been Better for America
New York Magazine’s Ed Kilgore has argued that the United States would have been better off had Donald Trump won re-election in 2020 over Joe Biden. The columnist suggests that a Trump victory could have altered the political landscape of the 2024 election, avoiding the current challenges faced by the Democratic Party. Kilgore acknowledges that Trump would have inherited several burdens from the previous administration, but he believes the overall outcome would have been more favorable for the nation.
Kilgore’s piece highlights the impact of the 2020 election on the political dynamics of the upcoming 2024 election. He posits that a Trump presidency would have led to a different set of circumstances, potentially avoiding the current issues that are driving American voters to support Trump in 2024. These issues, according to Kilgore, include immigration, inflation, and the age-related challenges facing Biden. He argues that the Democratic Party’s alignment with these negative realities has made Trump’s political comeback possible.
Furthermore, Kilgore’s article discusses the broader implications of Trump’s political influence, suggesting that his policies have led to a GOP that is ‘devoted to hatefulness and extremism.’ He also notes that the Democratic Party is in a state of disarray, lacking a clear path forward. Kilgore concludes that despite the challenges, a Trump victory in 2020 would not have been worse for the United States than the current situation.
His argument is a provocative take on the implications of the 2020 election, offering a stark perspective on the current state of American politics. Kilgore’s column continues to spark discussion among political analysts and the broader public, as it presents a unique viewpoint on how the political landscape is shaped by past events.