Senator Cory Booker, a Democrat from New Jersey, has launched a sharp attack on former national security advisor Mike Waltz, accusing him of displaying ‘profound cowardice’ and failing in his duty during a Senate confirmation hearing for the U.N. ambassador position. The criticism follows intense questioning from Democrats about Waltz’s involvement in the Signal group chat used to discuss strikes against the Houthis in March. Booker’s remarks came as part of a broader scrutiny over the incident, known as ‘Signalgate,’ which has sparked debates over the handling of classified information and the responsibility of high-ranking officials.
During the hearing, Booker criticized Waltz for not taking accountability or offering constructive insights into what lessons had been learned from the controversy. The Signal chat included top administration figures like V.P. JD Vance, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, and Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth, alongside a journalist from the Atlantic. The Trump administration has consistently maintained that no classified information was disclosed, but Democratic lawmakers have raised concerns that certain details shared in the chat could have endangered troops. Booker emphasized the need for leadership and integrity, stating that Waltz’s failure to address the issue was disqualifying for his nomination.
Waltz, a former U.S. congressman from Florida and a retired Army National Guard colonel, defended his stance, claiming that he had ‘nothing but deep disappointment’ in the criticism and that the last thing his past soldiers would call him was a ‘coward.’ Despite the backlash, Waltz’s team has maintained that no disciplinary actions were taken and that the incident was thoroughly investigated. The Pentagon’s inspector general is still reviewing the matter, and no definitive conclusions have been reached. However, the controversy has led to further scrutiny of other national security council members, with some being removed from their positions in what appears to be a purge following the leak.
The incident has also drawn attention to the broader implications of mishandling classified information, particularly in high-stakes military operations. Critics argue that the Signal chat’s contents, which included specific attack details, could have compromised operational security and put lives at risk. As the U.S. continues to navigate complex international challenges, the debate over accountability and leadership in the national security apparatus remains a critical topic of discussion among policymakers and the public. The outcome of this controversy could shape future discussions on transparency, security protocols, and the responsibilities of those in positions of power.