A Massachusetts State Police forensic expert revealed that potential blood samples from red Solo cups collected by Canton Police were never tested. This revelation came during Karen Read’s murder trial, where the evidence’s integrity and handling were under scrutiny.
During the trial, O’Keefe’s niece and forensic experts gave testimony, detailing the collection and analysis of evidence. Hartnett, a forensic scientist, testified that the blood samples from the red Solo cups were never tested, leaving uncertainty about their authenticity and relevance.
She described the evidence collected from the crime scene as containing broken glass, scratches, and damages to Read’s SUV, as well as blood and debris found on O’Keefe’s clothing. Despite collecting samples, she could not definitively identify the substance without testing, raising questions about the evidence’s validity.
The defense has been leveraging this information to challenge the prosecution’s case, arguing that the lack of testing and proper evidence handling could compromise the trial’s integrity. The case’s outcome is heavily influenced by the credibility of the evidence presented, with significant implications for the accused.
Furthermore, the testimony shed light on procedural missteps in evidence collection, including the use of unconventional materials like grocery bags instead of proper evidence containers. These issues highlight the importance of meticulous evidence handling in criminal investigations, affecting the reliability of the findings and the court’s perception of the case.