On his 75th birthday, Steve Wozniak, the co-founder of Apple, is not only reflecting on his legacy but also grappling with the ongoing fallout of a five-year legal battle against YouTube. The dispute began in 2020, when a video using Wozniak’s likeness was used to perpetuate a Bitcoin scam, leading to the loss of life savings for some individuals. Wozniak, who first brought the issue to light through an interview with CBS News, has since taken legal action, arguing that YouTube’s inaction allowed the fraudulent content to spread. However, the case has been repeatedly stalled due to Section 230, a federal statute that grants social media platforms complete immunity from liability for user-generated content. This law, which has long been a cornerstone of online discourse, has become a major obstacle in Wozniak’s pursuit of justice. The legal team representing Wozniak, led by attorney Brian Danitz, argues that Section 230’s broad protections have rendered the lawsuit nearly impossible to pursue. Danitz highlighted that the law’s absolute liability shield makes it nearly impossible to bring any case against platforms like YouTube, effectively absolving them of any responsibility for harmful content. Wozniak himself has expressed frustration with the situation, stating that YouTube’s failure to act despite multiple reports from his wife, Janet Wozniak, underscores the limitations of the law. While Google has responded by emphasizing its commitment to addressing abuse of its platform, the Wozniak family maintains that their concerns were not adequately addressed. Despite the legal challenges, Wozniak remains proud of Apple’s achievements, having sold most of his shares in the mid-1980s before leaving the company. Today, he still receives a small income from Apple for his public appearances and advocacy, though he has not shied away from criticizing the company’s decisions when he disagrees. “Apple is still the best,” he said, yet he remains vocal about his desire for more openness in the company’s processes. When asked if Apple listens to his opinions, he responded with a smile, “Oh, no. Oh, no.” The article also notes that the piece is part of the ongoing discussion about the intersection of technology, law, and corporate responsibility in the digital age.