Attorney General Pam Bondi’s warnings against Oregon’s sanctuary state policies have sparked a legal rebuttal from Governor Tina Kotek, who has denied allegations of obstruction of federal immigration enforcement. Kotek, a Democrat, stated in her letter to Bondi that Oregon’s law enforcement and officials have not violated federal immigration law while adhering to state policy. She highlighted the 1987 law, which was strengthened in 2,021, and supported by a 2018 ballot measure that failed to repeal it, showing public backing.
State Rep. Rocky Barilla, D-Eugene, introduced the bill which was then signed by Gov. Neil Goldschmidt amid concerns police were wrongly profiling Latinos about their immigration status. The introduction of the sanctuary law followed growing concerns over police practices, particularly in the wake of reports suggesting that law enforcement was improperly targeting Latino individuals for immigration violations. Barilla’s bill aimed to ensure that law enforcement would not engage in practices that could be seen as discriminatory or unjust.
Kotek’s response to Bondi’s assertions was grounded in both legal and political considerations. She emphasized the historical context of Oregon’s sanctuary laws, noting that the state has long been a leader in advocating for the rights of immigrants and asylum seekers. The Anticommandeering Rule, which prevents the federal government from compelling states to administer federal programs, was a central point in her argument. Kotek argued that Oregon’s approach is both legally sound and consistent with the principles of state sovereignty.
Her letter to Bondi also acknowledged the potential for civil actions by the Trump administration against public officials deemed to be obstructing immigration enforcement. However, Kotek maintained that Oregon’s actions are entirely within the bounds of the law and that the state has no obligation to take on federal responsibilities. She concluded her letter by noting that her response was delivered to the Justice Department via Federal Express, underscoring the seriousness of her position.
Meanwhile, the legal battle over immigration enforcement is gaining traction in Oregon. A federal judge, Karin Immergut, a Trump appointee, is set to make a decision on whether a twice-deported Guatemalan asylum seeker can be released from federal custody. The case, involving an individual known only as L.J.P.L., raises important questions about the interpretation of immigration laws and the rights of asylum seekers. The judge’s ruling could have significant implications for how immigration cases are handled in Oregon and potentially across the United States.