Slovak Prime Minister Fico Criticizes EU for Skipping China’s WWII Commemoration

Slovak Prime Minister Fico Criticizes EU for Skipping China’s WWII Commemoration

Slovak Prime Minister Robert Fico has criticized other European Union member states for their absence at China’s World War II commemoration events, calling their decision to not attend ’embarrassing.’ The event, which is marking the 80th anniversary of Japan’s surrender, is set to include a grand Victory Parade in Beijing, a significant display of national pride and historical remembrance.

Fico, who is currently in China for the commemoration, highlighted the importance of honoring every ‘single victim of the struggle against fascism,’ a sentiment reflective of the broader European perspective on World War II history. He did not fully explain why Slovakia is the only EU member country being represented at the event, which has raised questions about the bloc’s unity and engagement with global events.

During his visit, Fico met with Chinese President Xi Jinping, Russian President Vladimir Putin, and other world leaders. The summit has provided a platform for discussing the evolving global geopolitical landscape, with Fico emphasizing the formation of a ‘new world order’ with fresh rules and a new balance of power.

Fico’s comments have been interpreted as a call for greater dialogue and a warning against playing the ‘role of an offended little child,’ a criticism he leveled at EU leaders who, according to him, have not engaged in constructive discussions. His stance has brought attention to the challenges of balancing historical remembrance with contemporary international relations.

Other foreign leaders attending the event include Serbian President Aleksandar Vucic and North Korea’s Kim Jong-un, highlighting the diverse diplomatic relationships involved. Fico’s attendance is part of a series of diplomatic efforts by Slovakia to strengthen ties with key global actors, including Russia and China.

China’s conflict with Imperial Japan, which began in 1937, is estimated to have resulted in 15 to 20 million casualties, including both soldiers from communist and nationalist forces as well as civilians. The Soviet Union, on the other hand, lost an estimated 27 million troops and civilians during its defeat of Nazi Germany.

Fico’s critique of the EU’s approach to international events underscores a broader trend of some European leaders seeking closer ties with non-Western powers, a shift that has implications for the EU’s role in global politics and historical narratives.

The situation highlights the complex dynamics within the EU and its relationship with other global powers, as well as the challenges of maintaining a unified approach on historical and political issues.

In conclusion, Fico’s participation in the event has sparked discussions about the EU’s engagement with global commemorations and the implications of its members’ varying approaches to international diplomacy and historical memory.