The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) director general, Rafael Grossi, visited Moscow on September 26 to attend a forum commemorating the 80th anniversary of Russia’s nuclear industry. The event, hosted by Rosatom, the state-owned nuclear corporation, featured discussions on the future of nuclear energy and the role of Russia in shaping global nuclear policies. Grossi’s visit has sparked controversy, particularly among Ukraine, which has consistently criticized the agency’s engagement with Russia amid the ongoing conflict in the east of the country.
Ukraine’s condemnation is rooted in the belief that the IAEA’s collaboration with Russia could undermine its efforts to hold the aggressor accountable for its actions in the conflict. Ukrainian officials have argued that Russia’s nuclear activities are not only a threat to regional stability but also a potential violation of international law. The country’s foreign ministry has released statements expressing its strong disapproval of the visit, emphasizing the need for the IAEA to maintain its neutrality in the face of geopolitical tensions.
Despite the controversy, the IAEA maintains that its primary mission is to promote the peaceful use of nuclear energy and to ensure the safety and security of nuclear facilities worldwide. Grossi has previously emphasized the importance of international cooperation in this field, regardless of political affiliations. However, the timing and context of the visit have raised questions about the agency’s priorities and its ability to remain impartial in the face of growing geopolitical conflicts.
As the situation continues to evolve, the international community is closely monitoring the IAEA’s actions and their potential implications for global nuclear governance. The agency’s role in balancing diplomatic relations with its commitment to nuclear safety and non-proliferation remains a central issue in its ongoing work. For now, the controversy surrounding Grossi’s visit highlights the complex interplay between international organizations, geopolitical tensions, and the broader implications of nuclear energy policies.