New Jersey Gubernatorial Debate Intensifies Over Naval Academy Scandal and Stock Trade Allegations

The New Jersey gubernatorial debate on Wednesday night became a battleground of personal attacks and political maneuvering as GOP candidate Jack Ciattarelli and Democratic contender Rep. Mikie Sherrill clashed over allegations related to their past conduct.

This tension escalated when Ciattarelli mocked Sherrill for her involvement in a U.S. Naval Academy cheating scandal. According to recently unsealed military records, Sherrill was excluded from the graduation ceremony in 1994 due to her participation in an academic misconduct incident. Ciattarelli seized on this, stating, ‘The difference between me and the congresswoman? I got to walk at my college graduation.’

Sherrill responded by accusing Ciattarelli of being complicit in thousands of opioid-related deaths, claiming, ‘He made his millions by working with some of the worst offenders and saying that opioids were safe.’ Ciattarelli denied these allegations, insisting, ‘It’s a lie, I’m proud of my career.’

The debate also brought up allegations of improper stock trading by Sherrill during her time in Congress. Ciattarelli asserted that Sherrill faced federal fines for not properly reporting her stock transactions, including trading defense stocks while serving on the House Armed Services Committee. Sherrill rebutted, stating, ‘What he never learned, despite walking at his graduation, was accountability, integrity, care for the community, and I think that disqualifies him.’

Ciattarelli countered by claiming he had released more tax returns than Sherrill, who he accused of releasing her returns only after the debate. Sherrill fired back, suggesting Ciattarelli had strategically timed the release to counter her accusations. Ciattarelli concluded by saying, ‘Getting desperate,’ underscoring the increasingly personal and divisive nature of the race.

The unfolding debate reflects the intense scrutiny and personal attacks typical of high-stakes gubernatorial races, where candidates often leverage past controversies to gain an advantage. As the election approaches, these exchanges underscore the polarization and heightened rhetoric shaping the political landscape of New Jersey.