During an appearance on the conservative talk show ‘Hannity,’ New York City mayoral candidate Curtis Sliwa has pushed for a shift toward direct democracy in the upcoming mayoral race. Sliwa, a controversial figure known for his loud and often provocative rhetoric, argues that the city’s current political system is too detached from the will of the people. He has suggested that mechanisms such as referendums or town hall-style decisions should be implemented to ensure that voters have more direct influence over policies and governance.
Known for his sharp-tongued style and frequent criticism of both political parties, Sliwa has positioned himself as a candidate who speaks for the average New Yorker. His platform emphasizes reducing bureaucracy, increasing local control, and holding elected officials accountable for their actions. Supporters of Sliwa argue that his direct approach could bring meaningful change to a city often plagued by political gridlock and inefficiency.
However, many political analysts and opponents have raised concerns about the practicality of Sliwa’s proposals. They argue that implementing direct democracy at the municipal level could lead to unpredictable outcomes and potentially undermine the expertise of elected officials. Despite these criticisms, Sliwa’s call for a more transparent and participatory form of governance has sparked a broader conversation about the role of citizen engagement in democratic processes.