-
Boeing avoids felony prosecution for 737 MAX crashes after agreeing to pay over $1.1 billion in fines and strengthen safety programs under DOJ deal.
Following a federal judge’s ruling in favor of the Department of Justice (DOJ) on Thursday, a federal court in Texas dismissed felony charges against Boeing, relating to two commercial plane crashes that resulted in the deaths of 346 people in Indonesia and Ethiopia. The decision was prompted by Boeing’s agreement to plead guilty to conspiracy to defraud the government, which led to the dismissal of the charges tied to the Boeing 737 MAX 8 crashes in October 2018 and March 2019. The ruling was made by Judge Reed O’Connor, who was appointed by former President George W. Bush.
O’Connor’s decision, which accepted the DOJ’s motion to dismiss the case, did not satisfy the families of the victims, many of whom had been vocal in their opposition to the settlement and the outcome of the legal proceedings. The judge argued that the DOJ had not acted with bad faith and that it had adhered to its legal obligations under the Crime Victims’ Rights Act. Additionally, O’Connor highlighted the satisfaction of providing conclusory reasons for the dismissal and meeting the DOJ’s duties as per the law. Despite the judge’s acknowledgment, the families remain dissatisfied, believing the agreement fell short in securing the accountability and safety measures they demanded.
Under the terms of the settlement, Boeing is required to pay more than $1.1 billion in fines, with additional funds allocated for strengthening its safety and compliance programs. The funds allocated for the victims’ families amounted to over $445 million, a significant sum intended to provide support and compensation for those affected by the crashes. The DOJ maintained that the agreement was in the best interest of the victims and that the government had fulfilled its statutory obligations in ensuring that the deal was reached.
The ruling, however, has not quelled the opposition from the families of the victims. Tracy Brammeier, a partner at Clifford Law Offices representing the plaintiff’s team, is set to pursue an appeal of the ruling, believing that the decision did not align with the public’s interest in justice and safety. Brammeier emphasized the importance of the families’ right to seek justice, despite the legal limitations that restrict their ability to challenge the government’s decision. The families remain deeply affected by the loss of their loved ones and are determined to assert their rights through the appeals process.
Furthermore, the judge’s ruling has brought to light the ongoing issues surrounding the Boeing 737 MAX series, with recent concerns about engine safety affecting several of the aircraft. The National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) issued an urgent safety bulletin regarding engines found in some Boeing 737 MAX jets, further complicating the situation for the company. These additional findings may lead to further scrutiny, and the ongoing safety issues present challenges for Boeing as it endeavors to rebuild its reputation and ensure the safety of its operations.
The settlement and the ruling have sparked debates about corporate accountability and the balance between legal obligations and the need for justice for the victims. While Boeing has committed to honoring the obligations of the agreement, the families and critics continue to voice their concerns about the adequacy of the measures taken to address the safety issues and the accountability of the company. The ongoing legal battles, combined with the recent safety concerns, will likely shape the future of Boeing’s relationship with regulators, investors, and the public at large.