Cassidy Investigates Blue States Over Alleged Title IX Violations

Sen. Bill Cassidy, a Republican from Louisiana, has launched an investigation into over a dozen blue states, including California, New York, and Washington, D.C., for alleged violations of the Title IX law, which prohibits sex-based discrimination in educational programs. The probe is centered on whether these states are complying with President Donald Trump’s executive order, which restricts biological males from participating in women’s sports. This order aims to roll back changes made during the previous administration regarding gender identity and Title IX enforcement.

Cassidy is examining the inclusion of transgender athletes in female sports programs and policies that allow shared access to facilities such as locker rooms and bathrooms. His investigation comes amid a wave of legal battles, including a petition by over 130 Democratic members of Congress to support transgender athletes in legal proceedings before the Supreme Court. The probe highlights the political and legal tensions regarding the interpretation and enforcement of Title IX, with Cassidy arguing that the law should protect female athletes from what he views as unfair practices.

The scope of Cassidy’s investigation is extensive, covering states like Connecticut, Arizona, and Massachusetts, along with several major universities and educational institutions. In a series of correspondence with state officials, Cassidy alleged that there were widespread violations of Title IX, including the continued inclusion of males in female sports teams and policies allowing shared access to facilities. He claimed that under the correct interpretation of the law, these actions constitute clear violations of Title IX.

Cassidy, who chairs the Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee, argued that previous administrations had expanded the definition of sex to include gender identity, which he believed undermined protections for female athletes. Trump’s executive order reversed these changes, returning Title IX to its original definition, and Cassidy emphasized the importance of upholding this standard to ensure women’s sports remain equitable. The states have been given a short deadline to provide the necessary documents for the investigation, underscoring the urgency of the matter.

The investigation is part of a larger debate on gender identity in sports and the role of federal oversight in such matters. As the Supreme Court considers cases that could reshape Title IX enforcement, Cassidy’s actions add to the growing tensions between different interpretations of the law. His focus on ensuring that educational institutions adhere to federal laws reflects the broader political and legal climate surrounding transgender rights and gender equality in athletics.