The Senate Judiciary Committee convened a hearing to assess former President Joe Biden’s ability to serve in office, a topic that has drawn significant political attention. However, the hearing, which was largely boycotted by Democratic senators, received minimal coverage from major broadcast networks, raising questions about the media’s commitment to balanced reporting. Despite its potential significance, the hearing was not prominently featured in the news cycles of NBC, ABC, or CBS, which opted instead to focus on other stories like the retrial of Karen Read and coverage of corporate diversity issues. This selective reporting highlights concerns about the partisan nature of legacy media and its potential impact on public understanding of political events.
The hearing, which was framed as a constitutional crisis, was not reported prominently by networks like NBC, ABC, or CBS, who instead focused on other stories like the Karen Read retrial and coverage of corporate diversity issues. The article critiques legacy media for selectively reporting on issues that align with Democratic narratives, while downplaying Republican-led investigations. The media’s approach has been criticized for its lack of objectivity, with some arguing that it serves as a tool for political bias rather than a neutral reporting of facts.
The bipartisan nature of the media’s approach is a point of contention, with some suggesting that the legacy media outlets are aligned with Democratic interests. This has led to a situation where significant political events, such as the hearing on Biden’s mental fitness, are not given due attention. Instead, the media’s focus tends to align with narratives that support the existing political order, potentially shaping public perception in ways that favor certain political stakeholders. This has raised concerns about the integrity of the media’s role in reporting on political affairs.